Total Sprint Pro
Block-to-line sprint training with a full relay-squad layer.
Discipline-specific apps grounded in real sport-science literature.
Training, nutrition, and insights engineered for the demands of your event.
Block-to-line sprint training with a full relay-squad layer.
Balancing speed and endurance for the 800 and the 1500.
Aerobic engine work for 5k, 10k and the steeplechase.
Rhythm, technique and speed for the sprint and long hurdles.
Marathon build-ups and race-walk plans with in-race fuelling.
Approach speed and takeoff for the long and triple jump.
Curve, plant and clearance, built around a single event.
Runway, plant and bar work with landing-safety-first progressions.
Rotational power for the shot, discus and hammer.
Run-up throwing with elbow-safe loading built in.
Starts, underwaters and race-pace density for the short freestyle events.
Pacing and mixed energy systems for 200 and 400 free.
Aerobic engine and threshold work for the mile and 800 free.
Stroke-specific technique and injury-aware training for the form strokes.
Four-stroke balance and transition turns for individual medley.
Swim, bike and run periodization with brick work and race-week fueling.
Match-week training and nutrition for adult grassroots players.
Structured fight-camp training, nutrition and weight-cut planning — from the first spar to fight night. The one that started it all.
Set a body-composition goal and get a tailored workout and diet plan that adapts to your weekly weigh-ins.
Loads, tapers and nutrition targets are traced to published sport-science — not generic gym folklore.
A 400 m hurdler and a pole vaulter train differently. Each app is engineered for that event’s physics.
Where the evidence is thin, we say so. Where we borrow from a sibling event, it’s disclosed.
Every build starts as a written research synthesis, graded honestly by source quality: peer-reviewed, named-coach consensus, or flagged as thin where the evidence runs out. A sample of the kind of science behind the collection:
Bishop et al., 2021 — combat-sport training-load literature
High-risk work like live sparring should stay a small share of weekly volume and get periodized like any other load — not treated as a fixture of every session.
Makino, Nakayama, Ando & Tauchi, Journal of Human Kinetics, 2023
Technique genuinely changes with approach speed — a slower rep isn't just a scaled-down version of the full movement, so it's coached differently, not identically.
Hanley et al., Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2022
3D motion-capture data from World Championship athletes sets real approach and technique targets by level — not estimates or guesswork.
Bissas & Bezodis, Frontiers, 2021 (World Championship finalists)
Technique cues are built from real timing data broken out by sex, not a single unisex rule of thumb applied to everyone.
Smyth, 2021 — 4.1-million-record endurance pacing study
Guidance is drawn from patterns across ability levels, not just elite times, so it holds up for a mid-pack finisher as much as a podium contender.
Seagrave's exchange-quality differential; Hetherington's squad data
Team events are measured against the sum of individual bests, not treated as an afterthought bolted onto solo training.
The demands of a 400 m hurdler and a hammer thrower aren't the same — so their apps aren't either.
Training loads, taper lengths and nutrition targets trace back to published research — and get audited against it.
Sessions pair with fuelling — macros, timing and race-day intake — in one place, not two apps.
Built and tested with the athletes who use them, on the phones they carry to training.
Testing is happening now across the collection. If you'd like to try an app before it launches — or you're a coach or athlete with a discipline you'd like covered — say hello.
Get started